Grinding is the terminology in gaming that's often applied to elements of tedious, repetitive tasks the player may (in some cases, often) need to accomplish in order to maintain a minimal degree of character power level or character skill competency according to the challenges they're expected to face.
Grinding does have a degree of subjectivity to it depending on the particular tastes, expectations, and how a specific player defines what is fun in a game. In my own case, for example, I often consider nearly all combat elements to be grinding unless it directly affects the outcome of a game's storyline yet I often enjoy the logistics and industry elements of a number of games which a lot of my friends simply cannot stand.
Cons
Unnecessary padding of game duration (though many times considered a pro, especially in subscription-model Massively Multiplayer Online games (MMOs)
Lacking entertainment value (subjective)
Emphasizes and reinforces character skill over player skill (more in commentary section below)
Pros
Aids development of reflexive player patterns (quicker player response times for common strategies)
Emphasizes and reinforces character skill over player skill (again, more in commentary section)
May be used to establish a period of learning strategies, features, etcetera with repetition of new elements
Commentary
There is both good and bad that can be said about a game that focuses more on character skill. To its benefit is how it allows for a slightly more fair playing field for casual or less experienced players, something that many MMOs will need to thrive due to their reliance on a much wider player-base. It is also a heavily criticized element of gameplay, for the same reasons, by hardcore players who often feel lacking challenge from games that implement grinding systems and which essentially handicaps development and implementation of more advanced strategies.
An important thing to keep in mind about grinding is that it tends to be more rewarding when considered as a rate equation (rewards over time) rather than a work equation (rewards over effort). This means that low-end efforts tend to pay off a lot better than high-end efforts due to lower chance of failure and a steadier but less impressive income of rewards. These sorts of efforts support the practices known as item or gold farming (randomized reward game elements have a higher output with higher numbers of weaker opposition defeated than fewer but higher quality opposition) and is sometimes why the practice of grinding is called xp farming.
Friday, October 28, 2011
Thursday, October 27, 2011
Game review: Piggy Wiggy
Piggy Wiggy is a physics puzzle game developed by Anton Kosechkin with graphics by mAx and music by Sergei Stern. According to the credits, it was made using the Box 2D engine. The goal in the levels of Piggy Wiggy is to help the pigs reach acorns through creating and breaking tethers as well as manipulating objects.
Summary of analysis
Hands-on new player experience, short and fun gameplay experience, mouse or mouse+keyboard control scheme with minimal non-gameplay interface, cutesy graphics, appealing music and sound.
Tutorial/New player experience
There's only a few skills a player will need to learn in order to make it through the game and they're effectively introduced mostly through one-time only interface elements. This game gives the player these hints and lets them watch what occurs in order to teach them how to play.
Gameplay experience
Piggy Wiggy is a short and amusing game, there's a low degree of difficulty, making for a pleasant diversion.There's a slight amount of replay value for those wanting to get a higher score.
Interface & Controls
The game is mostly mouse-controlled with a few keyboard hotkeys available if desired. The game's interface holds a few menu controls and the mouse variant to the keyboard hotkeys.
Graphics
Cute, cartoonish piggies! They have idle animations in addition to interactive animations such as collecting the acorns and, unfortunately, crying should they get lonely or in pain.
Music & Sound
There's a single, upbeat background track throughout gameplay that effectively supports the game's theme. In addition, there's some pleasant and amusing sound effects to go along with the animations.
Commentary
Piggy Wiggy seems to effectively accomplish what it set out to do, be a fun game without being a major time commitment to either player or developer.
I was surprised to see that although the game's developer has a lot of titles under their belt that they've yet to establish a personal-professional site. By now, I'd imagine that they've got enough experience to showcase their accomplishments and even pursue a career with many of the established studios.
Summary of analysis
Hands-on new player experience, short and fun gameplay experience, mouse or mouse+keyboard control scheme with minimal non-gameplay interface, cutesy graphics, appealing music and sound.
Tutorial/New player experience
There's only a few skills a player will need to learn in order to make it through the game and they're effectively introduced mostly through one-time only interface elements. This game gives the player these hints and lets them watch what occurs in order to teach them how to play.
Gameplay experience
Piggy Wiggy is a short and amusing game, there's a low degree of difficulty, making for a pleasant diversion.There's a slight amount of replay value for those wanting to get a higher score.
Interface & Controls
The game is mostly mouse-controlled with a few keyboard hotkeys available if desired. The game's interface holds a few menu controls and the mouse variant to the keyboard hotkeys.
Graphics
Cute, cartoonish piggies! They have idle animations in addition to interactive animations such as collecting the acorns and, unfortunately, crying should they get lonely or in pain.
Music & Sound
There's a single, upbeat background track throughout gameplay that effectively supports the game's theme. In addition, there's some pleasant and amusing sound effects to go along with the animations.
Commentary
Piggy Wiggy seems to effectively accomplish what it set out to do, be a fun game without being a major time commitment to either player or developer.
I was surprised to see that although the game's developer has a lot of titles under their belt that they've yet to establish a personal-professional site. By now, I'd imagine that they've got enough experience to showcase their accomplishments and even pursue a career with many of the established studios.
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Game review: Lab of the Dead
Lab of the Dead is a strategy game sponsored by Newgrounds. It was programmed by Evil-Dog, features the artwork of SickDeathFiend and music by Symphony of Specters and Evil-Dog. The game's premise is to perform research on zombies, meaning the player will be testing the effects of various objects upon the living dead. Fair warning, the game is considered mature audiences only, likely due to subject matter and gritty content.
Summary of analysis
Comprehensive and well-accomplished new player experience, interesting but over-padded gameplay experience, complex menu-driven interface, decent graphics which lose their appeal over time, competently-accomplished music and sound.
Tutorial/New player experience
Lab of the Dead features a relatively comprehensive amount of tutorial elements, every object has its own data which can eventually be brought up for review and hints and the game keeps track of a lot of stats for the player. Given the premise of the game, it's actually very appropriate to let the player discover how to do things through trial and error.
Gameplay experience
Most of the early gameplay flows very quickly and manages to be interesting, but this diminishes almost as fast as it begins with a dawning realization that the game is a multiple hour commitment to be able to see all the game's features and content. I'm going to give it to you straight, the game involves a lot of task grinding which becomes exponential as more features are introduced. Thankfully, newly-discovered reactions and achievements help take some edge out of the research point farming by rewarding the player more than the actions normally would. But the game relies far, far more on character skill than player skill and it pads its length with wait times while "researching".
Interface & Controls
As a mouse-controlled, menu-driven game, there's a lot of interface to handle. Luckily, elements of the interface are introduced over the course of play and there's very few ways that the player can accidentally screw up their gameplay experience (one discovered so far by me is lack of a save game feature, which may be site specific to where I'd first tried my hand at it).
Graphics
I'm a bit torn in opinion on the game's graphics. On one hand, there's a good deal of detail and work put into this game. On the other hand, the game's duration gives a player the chance to see where corners were cut and templates were applied. For someone with experience in the industry, it's likely to be obvious, quickly, where elements were recycled. Still, those first-time discoveries of reactions are made a bit more rewarding by the monotony of the grinding (at least when they're significantly different from the usual animations).
Music & Sound
The background music seemed minimal in part due to being a much lower volume level than sound effects and also due to a lot of gameplay time spent without any music playing, leaving the player in an almost eerie, sterile quiet. Whatever the case may have been with the design, it seems a decent choice of avoiding annoyance factor of hearing cyclical music over the course of multiple hours. Sound effects are a mix of interactive occurrence, ambient zombie sounds, and interface sound effects. Some of the interface sound effects seem a bit overly dramatic with sharp-sudden effects accompanying "neutral" reactions.
Commentary
While an interesting gameplay experience, there's way too little emphasis on player skill to this title. The game really just plays itself with suggestions from the player. For the most part, this seems to be a seasonal title that likely started out as being just for fun but wound up being overly-complicated and ultimately wasteful design. That's not to say that it isn't a well put together piece, but that the gameplay experience is unlikely to be able to support the sheer mass of the game's features. There's a diminishing appeal to players over time and Lab of the Dead's gameplay length outlives the length of appeal.
Summary of analysis
Comprehensive and well-accomplished new player experience, interesting but over-padded gameplay experience, complex menu-driven interface, decent graphics which lose their appeal over time, competently-accomplished music and sound.
Tutorial/New player experience
Lab of the Dead features a relatively comprehensive amount of tutorial elements, every object has its own data which can eventually be brought up for review and hints and the game keeps track of a lot of stats for the player. Given the premise of the game, it's actually very appropriate to let the player discover how to do things through trial and error.
Gameplay experience
Most of the early gameplay flows very quickly and manages to be interesting, but this diminishes almost as fast as it begins with a dawning realization that the game is a multiple hour commitment to be able to see all the game's features and content. I'm going to give it to you straight, the game involves a lot of task grinding which becomes exponential as more features are introduced. Thankfully, newly-discovered reactions and achievements help take some edge out of the research point farming by rewarding the player more than the actions normally would. But the game relies far, far more on character skill than player skill and it pads its length with wait times while "researching".
Interface & Controls
As a mouse-controlled, menu-driven game, there's a lot of interface to handle. Luckily, elements of the interface are introduced over the course of play and there's very few ways that the player can accidentally screw up their gameplay experience (one discovered so far by me is lack of a save game feature, which may be site specific to where I'd first tried my hand at it).
Graphics
I'm a bit torn in opinion on the game's graphics. On one hand, there's a good deal of detail and work put into this game. On the other hand, the game's duration gives a player the chance to see where corners were cut and templates were applied. For someone with experience in the industry, it's likely to be obvious, quickly, where elements were recycled. Still, those first-time discoveries of reactions are made a bit more rewarding by the monotony of the grinding (at least when they're significantly different from the usual animations).
Music & Sound
The background music seemed minimal in part due to being a much lower volume level than sound effects and also due to a lot of gameplay time spent without any music playing, leaving the player in an almost eerie, sterile quiet. Whatever the case may have been with the design, it seems a decent choice of avoiding annoyance factor of hearing cyclical music over the course of multiple hours. Sound effects are a mix of interactive occurrence, ambient zombie sounds, and interface sound effects. Some of the interface sound effects seem a bit overly dramatic with sharp-sudden effects accompanying "neutral" reactions.
Commentary
While an interesting gameplay experience, there's way too little emphasis on player skill to this title. The game really just plays itself with suggestions from the player. For the most part, this seems to be a seasonal title that likely started out as being just for fun but wound up being overly-complicated and ultimately wasteful design. That's not to say that it isn't a well put together piece, but that the gameplay experience is unlikely to be able to support the sheer mass of the game's features. There's a diminishing appeal to players over time and Lab of the Dead's gameplay length outlives the length of appeal.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
Game review: Halloween Shooter
I'm certain there's a lot of games titled "Halloween Shooter", this one was released in October 2011 by Gameshot.org and Bored.com. The premise is simply to launch halloween-themed characters into their matching goals.
Summary of analysis
Lacking though possibly unnecessary tutorial elements, decent gameplay, mostly mouse-based controls with an awkward interface, appealing graphics, calm/casual music and amusing sound effects.
Tutorial/New player experience
The game is easy to play but relies a lot on trial and error and the absolute minimum of tutorial elements (i.e. it will tell the player about switching characters and point out their specific goal points).
Gameplay experience
It is an okay diversion, nothing really great however. The game's level design leaves a lot to be desired, especially when trying to fight physics and work around very awkward corners. To its credit, it's cutesy and extremely laid back gameplay.
Interface & Controls
Mostly mouse-driven control scheme with some keyboard hotkeys. The interface is occasionally problematic, especially with how often it's going to get accidentally interacted with in the course of trying to make awkward shots.
Graphics
The cartoon-style graphics are definitely the best element of the game, with rag doll character animation adding to the absurdity through their flailing around and slumping over after shots.
Music & Sound
Second to the graphics is the music and sound of the game. There's a subtle background music during the levels that's theme appropriate. The character sound effects are also amusing to listen to.
Commentary
There's little to say about this title, it had a lot going for it and a few notable issues. Probably the one thing that best aids it is being a short and simple game. Too many games go overboard with features, complex systems, and trying to appeal to far too wide an audience. If a game can manage to be fun, that's the most important thing.
Summary of analysis
Lacking though possibly unnecessary tutorial elements, decent gameplay, mostly mouse-based controls with an awkward interface, appealing graphics, calm/casual music and amusing sound effects.
Tutorial/New player experience
The game is easy to play but relies a lot on trial and error and the absolute minimum of tutorial elements (i.e. it will tell the player about switching characters and point out their specific goal points).
Gameplay experience
It is an okay diversion, nothing really great however. The game's level design leaves a lot to be desired, especially when trying to fight physics and work around very awkward corners. To its credit, it's cutesy and extremely laid back gameplay.
Interface & Controls
Mostly mouse-driven control scheme with some keyboard hotkeys. The interface is occasionally problematic, especially with how often it's going to get accidentally interacted with in the course of trying to make awkward shots.
Graphics
The cartoon-style graphics are definitely the best element of the game, with rag doll character animation adding to the absurdity through their flailing around and slumping over after shots.
Music & Sound
Second to the graphics is the music and sound of the game. There's a subtle background music during the levels that's theme appropriate. The character sound effects are also amusing to listen to.
Commentary
There's little to say about this title, it had a lot going for it and a few notable issues. Probably the one thing that best aids it is being a short and simple game. Too many games go overboard with features, complex systems, and trying to appeal to far too wide an audience. If a game can manage to be fun, that's the most important thing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)