The Honeymoon is Over is an 'escape the room' puzzle game from TimeFall. Like other games in its sub-genre, the premise is to figure out how to escape from a locked room or series of rooms.
Summary of analysis
No tutorial elements leading to a grating new player experience, mediocre gameplay experience, mouse-driven controls and minimal interface, moderately-appealing graphics, and pleasant/relaxing choice of background music.
Tutorial/New player experience
One day I'll see a game in this genre with tutorial elements... today, however, maintains the status quo. The new player experience is, in all honesty, terrible. The Honeymoon is Over, like many titles in the escape games style dumps the player with no explanation and questionable sequence logic straight into the gameplay leaving them to figure out everything through trial and error. Thankfully, most escape games, this instance included, are short.
Gameplay experience
The game's title also serves as a somewhat apt description of the gameplay experience. It's all hard work and optional reward, with the player having to figure out the developer's particular sense of logic through brute-force random effort. Sadly, there appears to be an incomplete features in the game, the phone and magazine combination, which only adds to the confusion when the player puts forth the efforts to no visible benefit.
In no way could I blame someone for looking up a walkthrough for a game such as this, it can make the difference between fifteen minutes and two hours.
There is also no replay value to the game as there is only one solution and a single, disappointing ending.
Interface & Controls
The game has a completely mouse-driven control scheme. The gameplay interface consists of an inventory bar and darkening edges which show movement between screens. There's a couple of zoom-in on object windows that feature an option to reverse the orientation of the objects in order to pursue objectives, however, these lack any icon or cues that signify the possibility.
Graphics
The game's graphics are decent, though the towel really looks more like a throw pillow. There's also no real way to tell apart interactive objects and non-interactive objects without clicking on them, leaving a player to click on every single object in the rooms *cough* multiple times *cough*. To its merit, everything appears to have been drawn in a single artistic style, adding to the level of professionalism and avoiding the jarring effects that can occur with haphazardly-gathered clip art.
Music & Sound
The background music fits the theme of a vacation/honeymoon getaway, creating a more relaxed mood than one may expect from the situation of being trapped. I personally find it to be an interesting choice of trying to reinforce the casual style of gameplay that the theme contrasts.
Commentary
I imagine that there's a sizable audience for escape games out there, players that enjoy the abstract and often convoluted sense of logic. Sadly, I've yet to see a single game in the whole sub-genre that manages good game design principles.
As a game design attempt, escape games are incredibly easy to put together but doing so with quality manages to be an almost holy grail of its style of gameplay. An internal hint system really would need to be available and well-built to keep things flowing. Next, the game needs to avoid relying on external knowledge or skills (I've actually seen one escape game that had a sudoku puzzle embedded, but never explained it). A helpful interface/graphics scheme that actually helps the player avoid clicking everything repeatedly would really cut down on wasted play time. Music and sound can be used to set the mood but is unnecessary.
Infinitely Refractive Echo is a blog about Games, Game elements, and the Games industry as viewed through the lens of my experiences. Throughout the blog, I'll be researching and analyzing many games as well as companies, notable individuals, players/communities, the industry itself, and game theory.
Friday, October 21, 2011
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
Game review: Tiny Squad
Tiny Squad is a tactical/strategy game by Ilia Karpenko. The game features a level approach similar to many online puzzle games but relies on tactical/strategy mechanics for gameplay. For each level, the player is assigned a number of points to build their "tiny squad" in order to defeat the opponents.
Summary of analysis
Significantly lacking new player experience, passable gameplay, adequate interface on controls, cutesy graphics, mediocre music and sound.
Tutorial/New player experience
Tiny Squad's new player experience is woefully lacking. A player is effectively left to figure the game out through trial and error with minimal tutorial or help elements to aid them. There are a lot of possible strategies that could be employed, but none are offered to the player to help them learn and even basic tactics such as positioning are left up to the player's discovery.
Gameplay experience
Overall, the gameplay experience is passable, but definitely nothing to acclaim. Compared to other titles in similar genre, Tiny Squad is barely a notable mention. On its own merit, it's okay but is bound to serve a much better purpose in being a learning practice rather than adding to a designer's resume.
Interface & Controls
The game's interface is largely unimportant to gameplay and could be implemented from the main menu, there's also a set of buttons to determine actions speed that seems more for personal amusement than necessary utility. Character specific elements of the game's interface, by contrast, are absolutely vital and would probably benefit from being less cluttered on the field of gameplay. The entirely mouse-driven controls scheme functions decently, especially with ranged effects, but tends to be unfortunately accident-prone when it comes to tactical movement applications.
Graphics
Probably the best element of the game is the its cute miniature characters. The character and effect graphics help keep many of the other issues from bogging down gameplay. Unfortunately, the menu/title screens shows much more emotive characters than will be seen during the course of play.
Music & Sound
There's only a few background musics, which are okay to listen to for a few levels, but which kind of lose appeal quickly. Sound effects used in the game do a decent job, though they could stand more variety when it comes to different themes of opposition.
Commentary
Games live and die by the new player experience and skipping such completely is going to cripple a game's chances. Even short games need to introduce a player to the concepts of play and a poor-quality help section is still better than dumping a player into the action without a clue of what they're doing. This, more than anything else hurt Tiny Squad.
From the information I could track down, this appears to be the developer's first attempt at a published game and the quality of Tiny Squad effectively backs this perception. Were I to recommend anything to them, it would be to study more of their competition as well as volunteered, constructive criticism. There's no shame in copying mechanics from successful titles and a game designer really should be very well experienced in both the genre of the title they're working on in addition to a wide breadth of titles (both good and bad) in general.
For independent game designers/developers/etc, some of the best titles are those that innovate, often blending together elements across genres while adhering to player expectations (as developed by popular titles) is what gets them mention in the industry.
Summary of analysis
Significantly lacking new player experience, passable gameplay, adequate interface on controls, cutesy graphics, mediocre music and sound.
Tutorial/New player experience
Tiny Squad's new player experience is woefully lacking. A player is effectively left to figure the game out through trial and error with minimal tutorial or help elements to aid them. There are a lot of possible strategies that could be employed, but none are offered to the player to help them learn and even basic tactics such as positioning are left up to the player's discovery.
Gameplay experience
Overall, the gameplay experience is passable, but definitely nothing to acclaim. Compared to other titles in similar genre, Tiny Squad is barely a notable mention. On its own merit, it's okay but is bound to serve a much better purpose in being a learning practice rather than adding to a designer's resume.
Interface & Controls
The game's interface is largely unimportant to gameplay and could be implemented from the main menu, there's also a set of buttons to determine actions speed that seems more for personal amusement than necessary utility. Character specific elements of the game's interface, by contrast, are absolutely vital and would probably benefit from being less cluttered on the field of gameplay. The entirely mouse-driven controls scheme functions decently, especially with ranged effects, but tends to be unfortunately accident-prone when it comes to tactical movement applications.
Graphics
Probably the best element of the game is the its cute miniature characters. The character and effect graphics help keep many of the other issues from bogging down gameplay. Unfortunately, the menu/title screens shows much more emotive characters than will be seen during the course of play.
Music & Sound
There's only a few background musics, which are okay to listen to for a few levels, but which kind of lose appeal quickly. Sound effects used in the game do a decent job, though they could stand more variety when it comes to different themes of opposition.
Commentary
Games live and die by the new player experience and skipping such completely is going to cripple a game's chances. Even short games need to introduce a player to the concepts of play and a poor-quality help section is still better than dumping a player into the action without a clue of what they're doing. This, more than anything else hurt Tiny Squad.
From the information I could track down, this appears to be the developer's first attempt at a published game and the quality of Tiny Squad effectively backs this perception. Were I to recommend anything to them, it would be to study more of their competition as well as volunteered, constructive criticism. There's no shame in copying mechanics from successful titles and a game designer really should be very well experienced in both the genre of the title they're working on in addition to a wide breadth of titles (both good and bad) in general.
For independent game designers/developers/etc, some of the best titles are those that innovate, often blending together elements across genres while adhering to player expectations (as developed by popular titles) is what gets them mention in the industry.
Monday, October 17, 2011
Game review: Bejeweled 3
Bejeweled 3 is another iteration of the very popular puzzle game series made by PopCap. The game's basic premise has been taken even further than the previous titles and spin-offs and Bejeweled 3 is almost an entire package of games rather than one.
Various game modes present different goals for achieving victory, making it possible to continually feel like the player is playing something new.
Summary of analysis
Expertly accomplished tutorial elements but slightly rushed new player experience, varied gameplay experience, adequate interface and simple controls, graphics pushing limitations of the franchise, decent music with mostly good sound.
Tutorial/New player experience
In addition to the introductory/objectives windows prior to game play, Bejeweled 3 also offers hover-over context help throughout gameplay, thereby offering a constant tutorial elements and reminders of objectives throughout the play experience. One minor issue with the new player experience is that it never really teaches the player so much as lets them learn it on their own during the course of gameplay, not a large isssue as most players will probably have tried one of the many other Bejeweled games but for truly new players to the franchise, it's likely to feel a little fast. Thankfully, the game's basic mechanics are quickly learned anyhow.
Gameplay experience
I think Bejeweled is definitely blurring the lines between casual and hardcore style games. While some of the modes and sub-modes were slow-paced and forgiving, others were outright frustrating and only achievable through random gem drops being favorable. This has been a trouble throughout the franchise's history as the random nature of the game update event can easily catch the player in no-win scenarios.
Greatly to the game's credit, however, is the fact that there's enough to keep a player busy and offer a fairly lengthy replay value to itself.
Interface & Controls
While there's a pretty contingent interface through the many modes, it's probably better to just focus on the objectives and ignore it, especially in the timed modes. The control scheme is as it's always been, click first gem, click switching gem and let the game do the rest of the work.
Graphics
There's very little room for improvement or change in the graphics of Bejeweled, as it's always been colorful gems on a playing field with backgrounds and interface (at least, to the best of my knowledge). While animated objects can help and special effects can be engaging, there's only so much that really should be done before it's just a step too far, as a few modes managed to prove in the transitional scenes. Being removed from gameplay by short pauses is often more infuriating than relieving, making the loss screens akin to being taunted while the more comprehensive victory screens (which were longer) actually accomplishing of that reminder that it's just a game and to take a break every now and then.
Music & Sound
The music was decently used, managing pacing throughout.adequately. Most of the sound effects were expected and welcome, with the exception of the announcer who just grated on my nerves every time he spoke.
Commentary
I think they should be offering this title's various modes as separately purchasable in addition to the whole package. A number of the modes really contrast in their play experience with the others, which is likely to appeal to some of the game's audience rather than all. But they're managing to do a lot to really make the game worth its price tag if paying for the whole thing. Overall, PopCap has kept to their usual level of quality and accomplished a slightly new spin on a title that's kept them going a long time.
Various game modes present different goals for achieving victory, making it possible to continually feel like the player is playing something new.
Summary of analysis
Expertly accomplished tutorial elements but slightly rushed new player experience, varied gameplay experience, adequate interface and simple controls, graphics pushing limitations of the franchise, decent music with mostly good sound.
Tutorial/New player experience
In addition to the introductory/objectives windows prior to game play, Bejeweled 3 also offers hover-over context help throughout gameplay, thereby offering a constant tutorial elements and reminders of objectives throughout the play experience. One minor issue with the new player experience is that it never really teaches the player so much as lets them learn it on their own during the course of gameplay, not a large isssue as most players will probably have tried one of the many other Bejeweled games but for truly new players to the franchise, it's likely to feel a little fast. Thankfully, the game's basic mechanics are quickly learned anyhow.
Gameplay experience
I think Bejeweled is definitely blurring the lines between casual and hardcore style games. While some of the modes and sub-modes were slow-paced and forgiving, others were outright frustrating and only achievable through random gem drops being favorable. This has been a trouble throughout the franchise's history as the random nature of the game update event can easily catch the player in no-win scenarios.
Greatly to the game's credit, however, is the fact that there's enough to keep a player busy and offer a fairly lengthy replay value to itself.
Interface & Controls
While there's a pretty contingent interface through the many modes, it's probably better to just focus on the objectives and ignore it, especially in the timed modes. The control scheme is as it's always been, click first gem, click switching gem and let the game do the rest of the work.
Graphics
There's very little room for improvement or change in the graphics of Bejeweled, as it's always been colorful gems on a playing field with backgrounds and interface (at least, to the best of my knowledge). While animated objects can help and special effects can be engaging, there's only so much that really should be done before it's just a step too far, as a few modes managed to prove in the transitional scenes. Being removed from gameplay by short pauses is often more infuriating than relieving, making the loss screens akin to being taunted while the more comprehensive victory screens (which were longer) actually accomplishing of that reminder that it's just a game and to take a break every now and then.
Music & Sound
The music was decently used, managing pacing throughout.adequately. Most of the sound effects were expected and welcome, with the exception of the announcer who just grated on my nerves every time he spoke.
Commentary
I think they should be offering this title's various modes as separately purchasable in addition to the whole package. A number of the modes really contrast in their play experience with the others, which is likely to appeal to some of the game's audience rather than all. But they're managing to do a lot to really make the game worth its price tag if paying for the whole thing. Overall, PopCap has kept to their usual level of quality and accomplished a slightly new spin on a title that's kept them going a long time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)